🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for children," said a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the local government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more measured position. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.