🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.